Quote Search
Car Insurance Travel Insurance Home Insurance Life Insurance Health Insurance
Keyword Search
Articles

AA

Abbey National

Admiral

Alliance & Leicester

AXA

Banking

Barclaycard 

Barclays 

Bradford and Bingley

Cahoot

Churchill 

CIC 

Confused.com 

Cooperative 

Cornhill Direct

Credit cards

Debt

Direct Choice 

Direct Line 

Egg 

Endsleigh 

Esure 

Finance Features

General finance

Halifax 

Hastings Direct 

Housing Market

Housing market

HSBC 

Insurance

Insure.co.uk 

Kwik Fit 

Labworks

Legal and General

Liverpool Victoria 

LloydsTSB 

Loans

Loans

Lombard Direct 

Mastercard

Mint

More Than 

Mortgages

Nationwide

NatWest 

NFU Mutual 

Norwich Union 

Other

Pensions

Personal loans

Post Office

Products

Providers

Prudential 

RAC 

Saga 

Sainsbury

Smile

Swinton 

Tesco 

Woolwich

Zurich
Sections

Car Insurance

Travel Insurance

Home Insurance

Life Insurance

Health Insurance

Personal Finance News

Copyright Notice
As Featured on NewsNow

Legal & General mortgage mis-selling fine "flawed"

Legal & General's £1.1 million fine for endowment mis-selling should be reduced, a tribunal has ruled.

The Financial Services and Markets Tribunal ruled that the extent of the mis-selling problem was not as large as originally thought.

As such, it announced the investigation was "flawed".

It is believed to be a big knock-back for the Financial Services Authority (FSA), as the original action was seen as a test case.

In a statement, the FSA said it would give "careful consideration" to the tribunal's observations and "look to identify improvements to its own procedures as a result".

Financial Mail uncovered emails as far back as 1998, showing that senior directors at L&G were aware that endowments might no longer be suitable.

However, according to the Financial Mail the firm continued to sell the policies for another two years.

The tribunal said yesterday's ruling would not affect any of the current claims for compensation.

A ruling on whether the FSA would have to repay any of the £1.1 million fine was delayed until a later date.