Quote Search
Car Insurance Travel Insurance Home Insurance Life Insurance Health Insurance
Keyword Search
Articles

AA

Abbey National

Admiral

Alliance & Leicester

AXA

Banking

Barclaycard 

Barclays 

Bradford and Bingley

Cahoot

Churchill 

CIC 

Confused.com 

Cooperative 

Cornhill Direct

Credit cards

Debt

Direct Choice 

Direct Line 

Egg 

Endsleigh 

Esure 

Finance Features

General finance

Halifax 

Hastings Direct 

Housing Market

Housing market

HSBC 

Insurance

Insure.co.uk 

Kwik Fit 

Labworks

Legal and General

Liverpool Victoria 

LloydsTSB 

Loans

Loans

Lombard Direct 

Mastercard

Mint

More Than 

Mortgages

Nationwide

NatWest 

NFU Mutual 

Norwich Union 

Other

Pensions

Personal loans

Post Office

Products

Providers

Prudential 

RAC 

Saga 

Sainsbury

Smile

Swinton 

Tesco 

Woolwich

Zurich
Sections

Car Insurance

Travel Insurance

Home Insurance

Life Insurance

Health Insurance

Personal Finance News

Copyright Notice
As Featured on NewsNow

Consumers needlessly buying life insurance

Consumers could be squandering hundreds of pounds a year on insurance that they do not need, according to a new survey, overall this could lead to billions being wasted each year.

The survey by the Consumers' Association found that more than half of mortgage advisers recommend life insurance to homebuyers who do not need it.

It approached 39 advisers and 23 recommended life cover to a homebuyer with no children or dependants who also received cover from his employer.

The Association found that many firms will pay a death-in-service benefit of about four times salary to dependants, which will cut the amount of extra life cover you need.

A number of discount brokers rebate some or all of their commission because they do not offer advice.

The survey also found that critical illness is problematic. Whilst the insurance pays out a lump sum if you are diagnosed with one of a list of serious illnesses, such as cancer or heart disease, it can be difficult to lodge a successful claim.

Experts say that income-protection insurance may be more useful, as it pays a portion of your income, typically about half, if you are unable to work due to an illness or accident.